纪录片自媒体解说素材-新闻动态参考-“ Lularich”打破了女装巨人的堕落：电视评论/‘LuLaRich’ Breaks Down the Fall of a Women’s Clothing Giant: TV Review
https://cdn.6867.top:6867/A1A/hddoc/news/2022/07/0505/1824zxvkm1kjuyd.jpg“ Lularich”打破了女装巨人的堕落：电视评论
‘LuLaRich’ Breaks Down the Fall of a Women’s Clothing Giant: TV Review
公司贪婪的法医细分可能是这一历史时刻的定义艺术品。从2019年决斗的费尔节纪录片到多次拍摄和书面探索，涉及亚当·诺伊曼（Wework）和伊丽莎白·霍尔姆斯（Elizabeth Holmes）（theranos），有一种探索看着强大的人的轻度失重使他们变得低落，看到为他们工作的普莱布斯（Plebes）暂时提高了星际目标。在不平等似乎比美国人一生中更加明显，更加头脑的时刻，在每个故事中，都有对全球经济混乱的真正分析 - 但是人们正在为是大屠杀。这是一个新的Amazon Prime视频系列“ Lularich”，使其类型值得一提。它既有助于多层次营销对参与其中的人的作用，又有两个创始人的形式的人类怪异的感觉，或者再次上升。女子服装公司Lularoe的创始人Deanne和Mark Stidham发现，卖出梦想的成功要比经营一致且易于扩展的业务。他们的Lularoe服装以三个孙女的名字命名，并以舒适和丰富多彩的风格而闻名，因为他们被出售的方式而被人们喜爱，直接来自利用个人关系或社交媒体Microfame的代表的消费者。华盛顿州检察长在定居的诉讼中，该结构称这是一项金字塔计划，使这对夫妇处于最富有的状态。这也破坏了一路上的生活和人际关系。他们与各种以前和现任员工一起在相机上讲话。在一次采访中引起观众的吸引者授予该项目的是他们宁静，无情的态度，即使是伟大的祝福者我们已经知道该业务基金会有深刻的裂缝。马克说：“我们是讲故事的人。” “这就是业务发展的方式。”叙事管理即使在危机模式下仍在继续：迪安（Deanne）询问人们如何找到钱来赚取高价的初始支出，以成为Lularoe的供应商，并以平淡无奇的方式说：“从一开始，我们一直在说，我们一直在说，Don'说，Don'说。请偿还债务！”她不屑一顾地说：“人们做饼干，做各种各样的事情，我不知道”- 这在我们得到启示之前，Lularoe建议其代表出售其母乳制造母乳，这一点开始蔓延。参与所需的资金。每当他们说话时，这对夫妇似乎都会犯罪，表现出自我，粗心大意和对受到伤害的人的关注的有毒混合。这是创始人心态变成烂的肖像。有可能为其他人赚钱在组织中，但是这部纪录片不言而喻地表明，它倾向于通过推荐而不是通过零售业务进行绘画的过程。对于Stidhams来说，这看起来像是传福音和传播好词。对于那些下面的人，这是一种磨碎。一直在利用人与人员的魅力和推销技巧的最高表现者被迫玩惩罚性和令人不快的数量游戏。对于最底层的人来说，该公司的批量增加，Stidham家族成员的无知，这意味着已经脆弱的公司对质量控制和服务的掌握完全崩溃了。同时，奇异的文化问题 - 包括强迫行业船只旅行，以自费为代价，并指控迪安（Deanne）向墨西哥进行了侵入性胃手术的压力，以提醒人们，为了为那些是基础工作的主要缺点freewheeling and Boundari的低点Es.Filmmakers Jenner Furst和Julia Willoughby Nason以前是“ Fyre Draud”的制造商，这两部电影中有关巴哈马式音乐会音乐会壮观的两部电影中的更好。在那里，他们在2008年后的美国经济背景下牢牢地设定了Fyre Festival，这一计划仅在一个往往会奖励痛苦的气氛中出现了。对于Fyre而言，这是一种重新构图的方式，该故事已经被媒体大量覆盖和代谢，但是Lularoe的故事感觉更新鲜，挑选不佳。关于“ Lularich”的意义，对项目的利益有效的意义几乎没有什么哲学上的。他们拥有建立了很棒的美国公司的创始人的支持，但仅出售图像和一些碎屑，一种包容性和属于柔软面料的束缚。Lularoe的质量控制随着时间的流逝而下降，这样，进入公司混乱的时代，服装倾向于在接缝处撕裂。 （明白吗？）Stidhams对电影制片人提出的指控没有任何有意义的回应；马克（Mark）曾经开玩笑说他的嘴里充满了鲜血，因为他咬了舌头。这个项目向我们展示了许多众多的观点和故事，并出于回应，创始人的奇怪和沉默，利用了卢拉洛（Lularoe）的底部繁重的结构：金字塔的本质（如果确实是lularoe是一个） - 是有很多，从下方来看，从下面发出的声音比从上方的权威之声声音要多。使“ Lularich”最有趣的是它相对于Lularoe历史而言。 Theranos崩溃了，福尔摩斯正在审判中； Fyre Festival的Impresario Billy McFarland入狱； WeWork仍然存在，但其自己鲁ck的创始人在2019年辞去了首席执行官的辞职。尽管Stidhams已经支付了解决方案，但Lularoe仍然非常going关注。惩罚费用最多的是，同事们我们听到的故事 - 在一个注定的项目，离婚，甚至破产的情况下，花了很多时间。这些故事对Stidhams的野心如此微不足道，不会阻止业务发展。但是，它们是纪录片的核心，该纪录片是对经济的清晰眼睛的焦点，似乎有一个无情的趋势来鼓励无尽的喧嚣，这是一个强大的叙述的理想场所。“ Lularich”在Amazon Prime Video上推出了星期五，9月10日。
The forensic breakdown of corporate greed may be the defining artwork of this historical moment.
From the dueling Fyre Festival documentaries of 2019 to the multiple filmed and written explorations of overweening founders like Adam Neumann (WeWork) and Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos), there’s a sort of giddy weightlessness in watching the mighty brought low, and seeing the plebes who worked for them elevated, for a moment, to star-witness status. At a moment in which inequality seems more pronounced, and more top-of-mind, than ever in Americans’ lifetimes, there’s potential for real analysis of the chaos of the global economy in each of these stories — but what people are tuning in for is the carnage.
So it is with “LuLaRich,” a new Amazon Prime Video series that makes a worthy addition to its genre. It serves up both a sense of what multilevel marketing does to those who participate in it and a dose of human weirdness in the form of two founders in the process of falling, or rising again.
DeAnne and Mark Stidham, the founders of the women’s apparel company LuLaRoe, found more success selling a dream than running a consistent and easily scalable business. Their LuLaRoe garments — named for three of their granddaughters and famed for comfort and colorful flair — were noticed and loved because of the manner in which they were sold, direct to consumer from representatives who leveraged personal relationships or social-media microfame. This structure, which the Washington State Attorney General, in a settled lawsuit, alleged was a pyramid scheme, made the couple at the top very rich. It also wrecked lives and relationships along the way.
Not that the Stidhams seem to mind, or notice. They, along with various former and current associates, are among those who speak to the camera. And what strikes viewers in the one interview the founding pair granted this project is their serene, unruffled attitude of being the recipients of great blessings, even after we already know there are deep cracks in the business’s foundation. “We are storytellers,” says Mark, with the sonorous assurance of a tent-revival preacher. “That’s how the business grew.” The narrative management continues even in crisis mode: Asked how people found the money to do the high-priced initial spend to become LuLaRoe vendors, DeAnne says, with bland faux-sympathy, “We’ve always, since the beginning, said don’t get into debt, please!” A bit of callousness begins to creep in as she says dismissively, “People make cookies, they do all kinds of things, i don’t know” — this before we get the revelation that LuLaRoe advised its representatives to sell their breast milk to make the money required to get involved. The pair seem to incriminate themselves whenever they speak, revealing a toxic mix of ego, carelessness, and lack of concern for those they’ve harmed; it’s a portrait of the founder mentality turned rotten.
There was, potentially, great money to be made for others within the organization, but this documentary unfussily lays out that it tended to come through the process of drawing in referrals, rather than through the retail operation. For the Stidhams, this looks like evangelizing and spreading the good word; for those beneath them, it’s a grind. Top performers, who had been leveraging person-to-person charisma and salesmanship, were forced to play a punishing and unpleasant volume game. And for those at the bottom, the company’s increased bulk, and the cluelessness of the Stidham family members studded throughout top leadership, meant that an already tenuous corporate grip on quality control and service completely collapsed. Meanwhile, bizarre culture issues — including forced-march boat trips for top salespeople, at their own expense, and allegations that DeAnne pressured underlings into getting invasive gastric surgery in Mexico — served as a reminder that there are major downsides to working for founders who are freewheeling and low on boundaries.
Filmmakers Jenner Furst and Julia Willoughby Nason were, previously, the makers of “Fyre Fraud,” the better of the two films about the Bahamas-set concert spectacular gone bust. There, they set Fyre Festival firmly within the context of the post-2008 American economy, a scheme gone wrong by mere chance in a climate that tends to reward grifting. For Fyre, this worked as a way to reframe a story that had already been wildly covered and metabolized by the media, but the LuLaRoe story feels fresher and less picked-over. There’s little overt philosophizing about what it all means in “LuLaRich,” which works to the project’s benefit.
After all, the company that the Stidhams made serves as rich enough metaphor all by itself. They have the bearing of the founders who’ve made great American corporations, but were selling just an image and some scraps, a feeling of inclusion and belonging tied to strips of soft fabric. Quality control at LuLaRoe fell off over time, such that, deep into the company’s chaotic era, garments tended to rip apart at the seams. (Get it?) The Stidhams have no meaningful response to the allegations they’re presented with by the filmmakers; Mark, at one point, jokes that his mouth is filling with blood, because he’s biting his tongue. This project, showing us the perspectives and stories of so many and presenting in response the founders’ oddity and silence, takes advantage of LuLaRoe’s bottom-heavy structure: The very nature of a pyramid — if indeed LuLaRoe was one — is that there are many, many more voices of the dispossessed coming from below than voices of authority from above.
What makes “LuLaRich” most interesting is its position relative to the history of LuLaRoe. Theranos collapsed, and Holmes is on trial; Fyre Festival’s impresario Billy McFarland is in prison; WeWork still exists, but its own reckless founder stepped down as chief executive in 2019. While the Stidhams have paid a settlement, LuLaRoe remains very much a going concern. The most punishing costs have been borne by the associates, whose stories we hear — time spent away from family on a doomed project, divorce, even bankruptcy. These stories, so marginal to the Stidhams' ambitions, won’t stop the business from rolling on. But they’re central to a documentary that comes into focus as a clear-eyed accounting of an economy that seems to have an unsentimental tendency to encourage endless hustle, the perfect setting for a powerful narrative.
"LuLaRich" launches on Amazon Prime Video Friday, Sept. 10.
本文资料/文案来自网络，如有侵权，请联系我们删除。
感谢大佬分享。我又来学习了~ 资源真不错，感谢分享！ 资源真不错，感谢分享！ 谢谢楼主分享，发现宝藏了。 谢谢楼主分享，发现宝藏了。 非常不错，感谢楼主整理。。 感谢分享，下载收藏了。最喜欢高清纪录片了。
页:
[1]