纪录片自媒体解说素材-新闻动态参考-普京和安全问题的“纳瓦尼”董事：‘我们知道我们开始这个项目时正在进入什么''/‘Navalny’ Director on Putin and Security Concerns: ‘We Knew What We Were Getting Into When We Started This Project’
https://cdn.6867.top:6867/A1A/hddoc/news/2022/07/0501/0824cg3jaqfwyuj.jpg普京和安全问题的“纳瓦尼”董事：‘我们知道我们开始这个项目时正在进入什么''
‘Navalny’ Director on Putin and Security Concerns: ‘We Knew What We Were Getting Into When We Started This Project’
丹尼尔·罗尔（Daniel Roher）与“纳瓦尼（Navalny）”（Navalny）一起执行任务，这是他认为生与死的人。纪录片制片人最后一次执导“曾经是兄弟：罗比·罗伯逊（Robbie Robertson）和乐队”（Robbie Robertson and the Band），相信全世界的人们越多地看到“ Navalny”，众人瞩目的焦点将在被监禁的俄罗斯持不同政见者中被命名，而弗拉基米尔·普京（Vladimir Putin）的政府杀死他将越有问题。亚历克斯·纳瓦尼（Alexei Navalny）是俄罗斯的一次总统候选人，他在2020年因神经气中毒，尽管普京和他的政府否认了这一点，但中毒后来与克里姆林宫有联系。纳瓦尼（Navalny）于2021年1月回到俄罗斯时被拘留。“如果我们能将亚历克西（Alexei）的名字保留在头条新闻中，那么政权将在监狱中谋杀他将很难谋杀。” “我作为这部电影导演的个人使命是让世界上尽可能多的人看到它。”随着俄罗斯和乌克兰的关注，华纳兄弟公司Swoop.n在4月11日和12日在北美的800多家剧院与Fathom事件一起在北美的800多家剧院上映。最初，该计划是为圣丹斯电影节上的颁奖典礼的Doc授予的，在CNN上首次亮相，并在HBO Max上首次亮相。罗尔说。电影制片人通过保加利亚记者克里斯托·格罗塞夫（Christo Grozev）与纳瓦尼（Navalny）取得了联系，并从2020年秋季拍摄了俄罗斯持不同政见者，直到去年年初被拘留在俄罗斯。上个月，一个俄罗斯法院因欺诈而判处纳瓦尼判处九年徒刑，但许多人认为他的判决是纳瓦尔尼反对普京的直接结果，以及他向俄罗斯人的恳求，以抗议入侵乌克兰。关于他在监狱中获得纳瓦尔尼的途径以及对自己的安全的担忧，这是您的第二张纪录片您的职业生涯，Navalny用他的故事信任您。您是否说服他，您是宣传的合适人选？是的。我们确实必须做一个球。好像我写了一篇12页的文章，而是一种氛围。它更多地坐在他对面，试图向他解释为什么我们要做的这项工作至关重要，必要和紧迫。我认为这就是这种感觉 - 历史正在我们讲话时现在在我们面前展开，我们需要记录这一点 - 引起了Alexei的共鸣。我认为他真的很感激这种情绪。他还想让Doc确保他的故事不仅被他的支持者看到，而且是世界各地对他不了解他的人的故事？Alexei的伟大天才是他的掌握社交媒体。他的理解是，一部纪录片 - 对他的故事的电影渲染 - 与YouTube视频有很大不同。 YouTube视频是立即的。这就像新闻广播。现在是。我T现在。而纪录片是用于历史的。时间延迟。它不是在一周内出现，而是在一年或两年或三年之内。他了解的以及他预见的是，从我们第一次见面的一年中，他可能处于监狱中的位置，或者他无法接近他，他知道纪录片可能是提醒世界的完美媒介关于他的故事，并重振了围绕他拘留的不公正的对话。在电影的制作笔记中，您说Navalny的“伟大天才是他的媒体敏锐度，他可以将新闻周期弯曲为他的意志并利用他的意愿并使用互联网实现他的政治目标。”是否有任何担心他邀请您拍摄他，他知道他想让您讲的故事？他不是电影制片人。以这种格式讲这个故事不是他的专业知识。他真的信任我们对最佳电影的专业判断。Alexei欣赏的东西D从一开始就是我带给该项目的完整性。我非常清楚地表明，如果他们决定与我合作，我将坐在驾驶员座位上。我会拥有编辑控制。同意这一点需要很大的信任，但他是游戏。Navalny企图暗杀是一个涉及几个人的复杂计划。在整部电影中，广泛详细介绍了克里姆林宫参与的证明。将所有这些信息编辑成一个简洁，可以理解的故事情节是什么感觉？这是一部在博览会之上的博览会的电影，从社论的角度来看，以一种引人入胜的方式包括所有这些信息，这是极具挑战性的消化。但是我们有一个非凡的社论团队。兰登·佩奇（Langdon Page）和玛雅·黛西·霍克（Maya Daisy Hawke）是世界上最好的两个纪录片编辑，他们带给这个项目的敏感性使我的视野和我的电影制作谱系和能力使它达到了我的水平永远不会独自到达。该纪录片是在2022年圣丹斯的美国纪录片竞赛板块的最后一刻的“惊喜”参赛作品。为什么？为什么圣丹斯在宣布其宣布之后的原因是出于安全原因。他们理所当然地担心，如果他们宣布这部电影，俄罗斯人会试图以某种方式破坏平台或破坏节日。在他入狱时，您已经与Navalny交谈了吗？我知道他的律师能够与他交流，但是我个人不是。我了解他一直在关注新闻，文章和采访等电影，我认为他对世界对我们纪录片的反应非常热情。您认为这部电影的发行会施加压力普京将纳瓦尼从监狱中释放出来？这不是我们的期望。我的期望是，以这种格式讲述亚历克三的故事会提醒他的困境。如果我们可以将Alexei的名字留在头条新闻中该政权在监狱中谋杀他会更加困难。我作为这部电影导演的个人使命是让世界上尽可能多地看到它。这部电影在数百家剧院中，最终将在CNN和HBO Max上播放。您将如何确保在俄罗斯看到该文档？我目前无法对此说话，但是我能告诉您我们有一个计划。在俄罗斯看这部电影是我的重中之重，对我和整个团队都非常重要。您是否担心这部电影发行后的安全？毫无疑问，俄罗斯人将尝试侵犯我的电子邮件和社交媒体。我毫不怀疑俄罗斯人将利用他们的肮脏技巧来抹黑我的同事，并试图暗杀我们的性格。这对我们来说是派克。克里姆林宫，普京和俄罗斯政府U这是这部电影的力量，他们将竭尽所能尝试抹黑电影制片人。我们知道我们开始该项目时所处的内容，并且我们已经存在并在Navalny及其家人的背景下工作 - 一些地球上最勇敢的人。我不禁受到Alexi的个人英勇的启发。
Daniel Roher is on a mission with “Navalny,” and it’s one he considers life or death.
The documentary filmmaker, who last directed “Once Were Brothers: Robbie Robertson and the Band,” believes that the more people see “Navalny” worldwide, the greater the spotlight will be on the imprisoned Russian dissident it is named for, and the more problematic it will be for Vladimir Putin’s administration to kill him. Alexei Navalny, a one-time presidential candidate in Russia, was poisoned with nerve gas in 2020, and although Putin and his government denied it, the poisoning was later linked to the Kremlin. Navalny was detained in January 2021 when he returned to Russia.
“If we can keep Alexei's name in the headlines it will be harder for the regime to murder him in prison” Roher tells Variety. “My personal mission as the director of this film is to get as many people in the world to see it as I possibly can.”
With the spotlight on Russia and Ukraine, Warner Bros. swooped in to give the documentary a theatrical release in more than 800 theaters in North America on April 11 and 12 in conjunction with Fathom Events. Originally the plan was for the doc, an award winner at the Sundance Film Festival, to debut on CNN and stream on HBO Max.
“Getting this film seen in Russia is my top priority and something that's very important to me and the entire team,” Roher says.
The filmmaker got in touch with Navalny via Bulgarian journalist Christo Grozev and filmed the Russian dissident from fall 2020 until he was detained in Russia early last year. Last month, a Russian court sentenced Navalny to nine years in prison for fraud, but many believe that his sentence is a direct result of Navalny’s opposition to Putin as well as his pleas to Russians from jail to protest the invasion of Ukraine.
The director spoke to Variety about his access to Navalny in prison and concerns about his own safety.
This is your second feature documentary yet despite being in the beginning of your career, Navalny trusted you with his story. Did you convince him that you were the right person for the job with a pitch?
Yes. We did have to do a pitch. It wasn't as if I wrote out a 12 page essay, it was more of a vibe. It was more sitting across from him and trying to explain to him why this work that we were trying to do was vital and necessary and urgent. I think it was that sense of - history is unfolding now in front of us as we speak, and we need to be documenting this - resonated with Alexei. I think he really appreciated that sentiment.
Did he also want to make the doc to ensure that his story is seen by not only his supporters, but also by people around the world who don’t know much about him?
Alexei’s great genius is his mastery of social media. Part and parcel with that was his understanding that a documentary - a cinematic rendering of his story - is very different from a YouTube video. A YouTube video is immediate. It's like a news broadcast. It's for the moment. It's for now. Whereas a documentary film is for history. It's on a time delay. It comes out not in a week, but in a year or two years or three years. What he understood and what he foresaw is that in a year from when we first met, he might be in a position where he is in prison, or he is inaccessible and he understood that a documentary film might be the perfect medium to remind the world of his story and to reinvigorate the conversation surrounding the injustice of his detention.
In the production notes for the film, you said that Navalny’s “great genius is his media acumen, he way that he can bend a news cycle to his will and use the Internet to achieve his political objectives.” Was there ever any concern that he invited you to film him, and he knew what story he wanted you to tell?
He's not a filmmaker. Telling this story in this format is not his expertise. He really trusted our professional judgment on what would make the best film. Something that Alexei appreciated from the very beginning was the integrity I brought to this project. I made it very clear that if they decided to work with me, I would be in the driver's seat. I would have editorial control. It takes a great deal of trust to agree to that, but he was game.
Navalny’s attempted assassination was a complicated plan that involved several individuals. Proof of the Kremlin’s involvement is detailed extensively throughout the film. What was it like editing down all of that information into a succinct, understandable storyline?
This is a film that is exposition on top of exposition, and it was incredibly challenging from an editorial standpoint to include all this information in a way that was engaging and digestible. But we had an extraordinary editorial team. Langdon Page and Maya Daisy Hawke are two of the finest documentary editors in the world and the sensibilities that they brought to this project took my vision and my filmmaking pedigree and ability and brought it to a level that I would never have reached on my own.
The docu was unveiled as a last-minute “surprise” entry in the U.S. Documentary Competition slate at Sundance 2022. Why?
The reason why Sundance hesitated on their announcement was for security reasons. They were rightfully concerned that if they announced this film, the Russians would try to somehow sabotage a platform or sabotage the festival.
Have you spoken to Navalny while he has been in jail?
I understand that his lawyers are able to communicate with him, but I personally am not. I understand that he has been following the news and the articles and the interviews and so on (about) the film and I think he's very enthusiastic about the world’s response to our documentary.
Do you think that the release of this film will put pressure on Putin to release Navalny from prison?
That's not our expectation. My expectation is that telling Alexei’s story in this format will remind the world of his plight. If we can keep Alexei's name in the headlines it will be harder for the regime to murder him in prison. My personal mission as the director of this film is to get as many people in the world to see it as I possibly can.
These days, it’s rare for a major studio to grant a wide release for a documentary, but Warner Bros. is putting the film in hundreds of theaters, and it will eventually stream on CNN and HBO Max. How will you make sure that the doc is seen in Russia?
I can't speak to that at the moment, but what I can tell you is that we have a plan. Getting this film seen in Russia is my top priority and something that's very important to me and the entire team.
Are you concerned about your safety after this film is released?
I have no doubt that the Russians are going to try hacking my email and my social media. I have no doubt that the Russians are going to use their dirty tricks to try and discredit my colleagues and try to assassinate our character. It’s coming down the pike for us. The Kremlin, Putin, and the Russian government understand the power that is this film and they will do everything they can to try and discredit the filmmakers.
We knew what we were getting into when we started this project and we are existing and working within the context of Navalny and his family -- some of the bravest people on earth. I can't help but be inspired by Alexi's personal bravery.
本文资料/文案来自网络，如有侵权，请联系我们删除。
非常不错，感谢楼主整理。。 感谢论坛提供了这么多好资源啊
页:
[1]